Intelligence Centre

How AESA ESG Intelligence Works

A complete exposition of the methodology, rating system, evidence architecture, framework integrations, sector calibration, market observatory, and calibration governance that underpin every intelligence output from the AESA platform. This page is the public-facing statement of how African ESG intelligence is built, scored, and governed.

Governance Principles

How Intelligence Is Produced

Every intelligence output on the AESA platform — whether a sector aggregate, company rating, evidence score, or gap register — is produced by a system governed by five non-negotiable principles. These principles are not aspirational; they are enforced at the pipeline level. Intelligence that cannot satisfy these principles is withheld from output.

fact_check
Principle 01
Evidence-Based Intelligence
All intelligence is grounded in identifiable evidence — disclosed documents, structured data, regulatory filings, or verified observations. Inferences that cannot be traced to a specific evidence source are not elevated to intelligence status. If evidence cannot be identified, the system returns an Insufficient Data classification rather than a synthetic estimate. This is a hard governance rule, not a quality aspiration.
link
Principle 02
Full Lineage Traceability
Every intelligence item carries a traceable lineage chain from raw evidence source through normalization, extraction, and inference layers to final intelligence output. This lineage is inspectable by registered platform users at indicator level. Sector aggregates carry lineage to their constituent company readings. Ratings carry lineage to their four source layers. The system does not produce black-box scores.
verified
Principle 03
Human-in-the-Loop Governance
AI-assisted intelligence extraction is always subject to structured human review. Analyst verification gates exist at defined stages of the evidence pipeline. Extracted items enter a governance queue before being elevated to intelligence status. Contested items are routed for specialist analyst review. Automated outputs are never published directly to institutional audiences without analyst clearance at the appropriate governance tier.
hub
Principle 04
Africa-Calibrated Indicator Logic
The MIL-150 indicator set is calibrated for African market conditions — not translated from OECD-origin standards. Calibration covers sector dynamics, sub-national regulatory environments, capital-constrained operating contexts, informal economy exposure, communal land systems, and smallholder value chains where materially applicable. Each indicator carries a documented calibration basis from one of three calibration categories: Formally Derived, Market Norm, or Working Assumption.
public
Principle 05
Methodology Transparency
Summary methodology is published here, publicly, as a permanent record of how intelligence is produced. Detailed methodology documentation — indicator definitions, scoring logic, evidence quality criteria, framework alignment details, and all 57 calibrated platform functions — is available to registered institutional users via the Intelligence Transparency Centre (ITC) inside the platform. The methodology is versioned; updates are logged and traceable.
Rating System

Ratings & Scoring Methodology

AESA ESG Ratings use a seven-band scale from A+ (Leading) to D (Insufficient) derived from a composite score on a 0–100 range. The composite aggregates four source layers — Evidence, Transformation, Assessment, and Disclosure — with defined weights. A confidence ceiling mechanism can constrain ratings where underlying data quality does not support a higher band.

Rating Bands
A+
Leading
≥ 85
A
Advanced
≥ 72
B+
Established
≥ 60
B
Progressing
≥ 48
C+
Emerging
≥ 35
C
Developing
≥ 20
D
Insufficient
< 20
Four-Layer Composite Model

The composite score is the weighted average of four source layers. Each layer contributes a 0–100 score derived from its own sub-indicators. If a layer has insufficient data, its weight is redistributed proportionally across the remaining available layers — the Evidence Layer is always required as the minimum composition.

45%
Evidence Layer
Breadth, confidence, framework coverage, evidence freshness, and source quality from the Evidence Intelligence Object (EIO).
25%
Transformation Layer
ESG readiness score, gap severity distribution, active project execution quality, and monitoring depth from the Transformation Intelligence Object (TIO).
20%
Assessment Layer
Weighted ESG questionnaire responses with severity-adjusted maturity — covers E, S, and G pillar self-assessment across sector-calibrated indicator sets.
10%
Disclosure Layer
Framework breadth of formal ESG disclosures and extraction completeness from the Disclosure Intelligence Object (DIO).
Confidence Ceiling Mechanism

Four rules govern confidence suppression. When a rule is triggered, the rating band is capped or penalised irrespective of the raw composite score. This prevents high-band ratings being assigned to companies with thin, stale, or narrowly-sourced evidence. Suppression reasons are recorded and visible to registered platform users.

block
Framework coverage < 40%
Benchmark eligibility blocked. The company is excluded from sector benchmarking until framework coverage meets the 40% minimum (4 of 10 target frameworks).
arrow_downward
Average confidence < 60%
Rating ceiling enforced at Developing band. No matter the composite score, the final rating band cannot exceed C (Developing) until confidence rises above the 60% threshold.
schedule
Evidence freshness < 20% of records recent
15-point staleness penalty applied to composite score before band assignment. Freshness between 20–40% triggers a 7-point penalty. Ratings are a point-in-time product; stale data degrades reliability.
category
Framework breadth < 3 frameworks
Rating ceiling enforced. Fewer than three frameworks means disclosure is too narrow to constitute a credible ESG reporting programme for institutional comparison purposes.
Evidence Architecture

Six-Stage Intelligence Pipeline

Intelligence is built through a six-stage pipeline in which each stage has defined quality criteria, governance protocols, and human review requirements before evidence advances. The pipeline is not a data flow — it is a governance chain. Material that does not clear a stage does not progress until its deficiency is resolved or it is explicitly classified as a known gap.

01
Primary Source Ingestion
Annual reports, sustainability reports, integrated reports, regulatory filings (NGX, SEC Nigeria, CBN), stock exchange disclosures, and other entity-published primary documents are ingested and registered in the evidence store. Each document is timestamped, source-attributed, and assigned a freshness status from the point of ingestion.
Primary Documents Regulatory Filings Timestamped
02
Regulatory & Standards Mapping
Each evidence item is cross-mapped to the applicable regulatory and framework landscape — NGX ESG Disclosure Guidelines, SEC Nigeria rules, CBN Sustainable Finance Principles, and the eight major international frameworks. This mapping establishes what an entity is obligated to disclose and what it has actually disclosed, creating the foundation for gap identification at the indicator level.
NGX / SEC / CBN Framework Cross-Map Disclosure Obligation Map
03
MIL-150 Structured Extraction
Evidence content is mapped against the 150 MIL indicators — the Africa-calibrated intelligence schema. Extraction is structured: each extracted item references its source document, page location, extraction method (direct quote, inference, absence), and the MIL indicator it populates. The system distinguishes between disclosed, derivable, and absent evidence for each indicator — generating the evidence quality profile and gap register.
MIL-150 Schema Disclosed / Derivable / Absent Source-Referenced
04
Analyst Review & Verification Gate
Extracted intelligence enters a structured human review workflow. Analysts verify extraction accuracy against source evidence before items are elevated to verified status. Contested items — where extraction confidence is below threshold or analyst judgment differs from automated output — enter a specialist review queue. Only analyst-cleared items proceed to the intelligence output layer. This is not an optional review; it is a mandatory governance gate.
Human Verified Governance Gate Specialist Queue
05
Intelligence Classification & Governance
Verified intelligence is classified by pillar (E, S, G), sector, framework alignment, and confidence band. Each item is assigned a lineage tag connecting it to its source document chain. Intelligence is maintained in the evidence graph with full lineage intact — any downstream score, rating, or recommendation carries a resolvable chain back to source. The governance record is permanent and immutable after sign-off.
Pillar & Sector Tagged Confidence Classified Lineage Anchored
06
Output Surfaces & Access Control
Aggregated sector intelligence surfaces publicly via this Observatory section and the AESA ESG Observatory. Company-level intelligence, evidence lineage inspection, detailed gap registers, ratings documentation, transformation roadmaps, and DFI-ready evidence packages are available only through tier-governed platform workspaces. Observatory outputs are sector aggregates: no company-level data appears in any public surface.
Public: Sector Aggregates Platform: Company-Level Tier Governed
Standards Intelligence

Fourteen Frameworks — Mapped, Integrated, Calibrated

The AESA platform maps intelligence against 14 ESG frameworks spanning global consolidation standards, universal voluntary standards, African regulatory requirements, and international reference frameworks. The mapping is not mechanical — each framework is analysed for its materiality implications in African market conditions, and framework gaps are identified at the indicator level rather than at the reporting section level.

merge
Global Consolidation Standard — Headlined
ISSB — International Sustainability Standards Board
The ISSB, established by the IFRS Foundation, is the most significant structural development in global ESG reporting. It consolidates the TCFD's climate disclosure framework into IFRS S2, and SASB's industry standards form the technical underpinning for sector-specific disclosures. The ISSB framework is being adopted by regulators in South Africa (via FSCA), Kenya (via CMA), and is referenced by SEC Nigeria and CBN guidance as the direction of mandatory travel. For African financial institutions, the ISSB timeline is now a capital market compliance issue, not a voluntary aspiration. The AESA platform tracks ISSB adoption trajectory, disclosure gap, and readiness assessment across all monitored sectors.
TCFD content absorbed into IFRS S2 · SASB sector standards underpin IFRS S2 industry guidance · Adoption timelines vary by jurisdiction
Universal & Global Standards
GRI Standards (Universal + Topic + Sector)
Voluntary
The most widely adopted sustainability reporting framework globally. GRI 1 (Foundation), GRI 2 (General Disclosures), and GRI 3 (Material Topics) form the Universal Standards. GRI Topic Standards cover specific material issues. GRI Sector Standards (Oil & Gas GRI 11; Agriculture GRI 13; others) provide sector-level materiality guidance. Foundational for the majority of African ESG disclosures.
Environmental Social Governance
IFRS S1 — General Sustainability Disclosure
Mandatory (ISSB)
IFRS S1 establishes general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information — covering governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics across all material sustainability risks and opportunities. Designed for investor-facing financial reporting and increasingly adopted by African capital market regulators as the baseline for listed company sustainability disclosure.
E S G
IFRS S2 — Climate-Related Disclosures
Mandatory (ISSB)
IFRS S2 consolidates TCFD's climate disclosure architecture into a mandatory IFRS standard. Requires disclosure across four pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics & Targets. Scenario analysis and financed emissions disclosure are the two areas with the largest adoption gap in African financial institutions. Effective for applicable jurisdictions from January 2024.
Climate Risk Environmental Governance
TCFD — Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
Absorbed into IFRS S2
The four-pillar TCFD framework (Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, Metrics & Targets) now constitutes the structural architecture of IFRS S2. TCFD is independently referenced by CBN, NAICOM, and many DFI conditionality frameworks, so it retains active standing as a named standard across African regulatory guidance even as its formal governance has transferred to the ISSB.
Climate Risk Governance
SASB — Sustainability Accounting Standards Board
IFRS Foundation
77 industry-specific standards identifying the sustainability topics most likely to be financially material in each industry. Now maintained under the IFRS Foundation and serving as the sector-specific technical backbone of IFRS S2 industry guidance. Particularly relevant for Oil & Gas, Agriculture, Consumer Goods, and Financial Services in the African context.
E S G
ESRS — European Sustainability Reporting Standards
International Reference
EU CSRD-mandated standards covering double materiality (impact + financial). Directly applicable to African subsidiaries of EU-parent companies and indirectly relevant via value chain disclosure requirements — any African company in the supply chain of a CSRD-obligated EU entity may face upstream data requests aligned to ESRS. Growing intelligence relevance for export-oriented African sectors.
E S G
African Regulatory Requirements
NGX ESG Disclosure Guidelines
Africa-Specific — Mandatory
Mandatory ESG disclosure requirements for companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX). Structured around Environmental, Social, and Governance pillars with defined disclosure items. Updated in 2024 to strengthen requirements. The primary regulatory anchor for Nigerian corporate ESG reporting — NGX compliance is the baseline from which most Nigerian-listed companies' ESG programmes begin.
E S G
SEC Nigeria Sustainability Disclosure Rules
Africa-Specific — Mandatory
Securities and Exchange Commission Nigeria sustainability-related guidance for capital market operators and regulated entities. Establishes sustainability risk disclosure obligations within Nigerian capital markets, complementing NGX ESG Guidelines and extending to a broader set of regulated entities including fund managers and capital market intermediaries.
Governance E
CBN Sustainable Finance Principles
Africa-Specific — Mandatory
Central Bank of Nigeria Sustainable Finance Principles and Sustainable Banking Principles (revised 2023) mandate ESG risk integration and climate risk management in Nigerian banks, development finance institutions, and mortgage banks. CBN compliance is a banking licence condition, not a voluntary programme. The CBN Climate Risk Management Framework (2023) adds specific climate scenario analysis requirements.
Climate Risk Governance
MIL-150 — AESA Master Indicator List
Africa-Native
AESA's proprietary Africa-calibrated indicator set: 150 ESG indicators across E, S, and G pillars, designed from the ground up for African market conditions. Each indicator is sector-calibrated and carries a documented materiality basis. MIL-150 is the intelligence backbone of the platform — it is not a reporting standard but the operational schema through which all evidence is structured, extracted, and scored.
E S G
International Reference Frameworks
IFC Performance Standards (PS 1–8)
DFI Conditional
IFC Performance Standards are the primary ESG requirements for International Finance Corporation investments and the reference standard for most bilateral DFIs, Equator Principles banks, and development finance conditions globally. PS1 (Assessment & Management), PS2 (Labour), PS6 (Biodiversity), and PS7 (Indigenous Peoples) are the most frequently triggered by African sector assessments. IFC PS alignment is a precondition, not a criterion of excellence, for DFI finance.
E S
AfDB Environmental & Social Standards
DFI Conditional
African Development Bank Integrated Safeguards System (ISS) and Environmental and Social Standards govern AfDB project finance and sovereign lending. Increasingly aligned with IFC Performance Standards, the AfDB's requirements are structurally important for public sector and infrastructure transactions in Africa. AESA maps evidence against AfDB E&S standards where relevant to sector assessments and DFI deal structuring advisory.
E S
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
International Reference
The 17 SDGs provide the aspirational reference frame most widely cited in African ESG disclosures. AESA maps MIL-150 indicators to SDG targets to enable SDG contribution mapping as part of disclosure packages. SDG mapping is not a scoring input but a reporting output — it helps entities articulate the development impact narrative their investors and government stakeholders expect.
E S G
UN Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI)
Voluntary
PRI signatory status is an increasingly important signal for African investment funds, pension funds, and sovereign wealth vehicles seeking international co-investment. AESA tracks PRI signatory adoption among African institutional investors and its downstream implications for ESG data request standards — a PRI-signatory investor creates consistent ESG data demand across its portfolio companies regardless of local listing requirements.
Governance E
Sector Calibration

Nine Sectors — ESG Materiality by Sector

Each of the 150 MIL indicators is calibrated for the specific African operating reality of its sector. ESG materiality is not universal — what is critical to an oil and gas operator is structurally different from what is material to a retail bank. The platform does not apply a single indicator set across all sectors and blend the result. Sector calibration is a foundational design decision.

account_balance
Banking & Financial Services
ESG credit risk integration, responsible lending practice, financial inclusion governance, board and executive accountability, and climate risk embedded in loan portfolio and treasury exposures. CBN Sustainable Finance Principles and IFRS S2 are the primary regulatory drivers.
Governance — Primary Environmental
NGX · GRI · IFRS S1/S2 · TCFD · CBN SFP · MIL-150
security
Insurance
Climate risk underwriting exposure — the African protection gap means most insured losses are unhedged domestically. ESG-integrated underwriting policy, responsible investment of premium float, climate scenario analysis, and catastrophe modelling for African physical risk profiles are the priority themes.
Governance — Primary Climate Risk
TCFD · GRI · NGX · IFRS S2 · NAICOM · MIL-150
local_gas_station
Oil & Gas
Emissions liability and scope 3 financed emissions; spill management and remediation accountability; community impact and FPIC obligations; decommissioning provisioning; and environmental compliance across operational, midstream, and upstream exposure. Community impact disclosures are the single most significant gap sector identified in current intelligence.
Environmental — Primary Social
GRI 11 · TCFD · SASB · NUPRC · IFC PS · MIL-150
precision_manufacturing
Manufacturing & Industrial Goods
Operational emissions (scope 1 and 2) and energy intensity; occupational health and safety in production facilities; industrial effluent and waste management; community environmental impact from manufacturing sites; and responsible procurement of raw materials from African commodity chains.
Environmental — Primary Social
GRI · SASB · MIL-150 · IFC PS · NGX
eco
Agriculture & Agri-Business
Land use rights and customary tenure; water stewardship in water-stressed geographies; biodiversity and deforestation exposure (EUDR compliance risk); smallholder livelihood protection; fair price mechanisms; and climate adaptation across cropping and livestock value chains. Smallholder and informal labour exposure is systematically underdisclosed.
Social — Primary Environmental
GRI 13 · SASB · TNFD · MIL-150 · IFC PS6 · EUDR
cell_tower
Telecommunications
Digital inclusion and universal service obligations; data privacy and cybersecurity governance; supply chain integrity for hardware and infrastructure; e-waste management; and responsible use of electromagnetic spectrum. Data governance is rapidly becoming a board-level ESG issue as Nigeria's Data Protection Act and pan-African frameworks expand enforcement.
Governance — Primary Social
GRI · NGX · SASB · MIL-150
bolt
Power & Energy
Energy transition planning and emissions intensity reduction; grid access and electrification equity; renewable energy deployment governance; just transition planning for fossil fuel-dependent communities; and climate physical risk to energy infrastructure. The most climate-critical sector in African ESG intelligence alongside Oil & Gas.
Environmental — Primary Social
TCFD · IFRS S2 · GRI · MIL-150 · SASB
apartment
Real Estate & Construction
Green building standards and embodied carbon in construction; community displacement and resettlement management; supply chain labour standards in construction; energy efficiency in commercial and residential assets; and community environmental impact from development sites. TCFD physical risk is a growing concern for coastal and flood-exposed portfolios.
Environmental — Primary Social
GRI · TCFD · IFC PS · MIL-150 · NGX
shopping_bag
Retail & Consumer Goods
Supply chain labour standards across informal and formal tiers; product safety and responsible marketing; packaging waste and plastic reduction obligations; consumer data privacy; and responsible sourcing from agricultural commodity chains where forced and child labour risk is non-trivial. EUDR has elevated deforestation-free sourcing to a formal compliance requirement for export-oriented consumer goods.
Social — Primary Governance
GRI · SASB · NGX · MIL-150 · EUDR
Cross-Sector Materiality Themes
G
Board governance & executive accountability — High materiality across Banking, Insurance, and Telecommunications. NGX Disclosure Guidelines are the primary driver of formal board-level ESG governance reporting. Weaknesses in board ESG committees and executive KPI linkage are the most common governance gap identified across monitored companies.
High
E
Climate transition risk & physical risk disclosure — Critical across Energy, Oil & Gas, and Insurance. TCFD-aligned disclosure adoption is strengthening, but physical risk assessment capability remains immature across most monitored entities. Scenario analysis is the most frequently absent TCFD element.
High
S
Labour rights & supply chain standards — High materiality across Consumer Goods, Agriculture, and Industrial Goods. Smallholder and informal labour exposure is systematically underdisclosed relative to operational risk profiles. Modern slavery risk assessments are almost entirely absent in current public disclosures.
High
E
Community environmental impact — High in Oil & Gas and Industrial Goods; significant in Agriculture. Community impact disclosures are the single largest gap between operational risk exposure and ESG disclosure quality across all monitored African sectors. FPIC documentation is absent in the overwhelming majority of oil and gas operators.
High
S
Digital inclusion & data governance — Emerging materiality in Telecommunications; growing across financial services. Data privacy regulation expansion across African jurisdictions (Nigeria Data Protection Act, Kenya Data Protection Act) is converting this from a soft reputational issue to a hard governance risk.
Medium
Public Intelligence Visibility

ESG Observatory — Africa

Aggregated sector observations, pillar maturity readings, and intelligence signals derived from the AESA monitoring system. All outputs shown here are sector-level aggregates — anonymised, publication-governed, and free of company-specific data. Company-level evidence, scores, ratings, gap registers, and transformation roadmaps remain inside governed platform workspaces.

ESG Pillar Aggregate — Africa Markets
E
Environmental — Climate, Emissions & Resources
62%
Disclosure Maturity: Developing
Climate risk reporting is gaining adoption across energy and extractive sectors. Physical risk assessment capability remains limited. TCFD-aligned scenario analysis is absent in the majority of monitored institutions.
S
Social — Labour, Community & Human Rights
54%
Disclosure Maturity: Emerging
Labour rights and community impact are strongest in consumer goods and agriculture — sectors where DFI conditionality and international supply chain scrutiny create the greatest disclosure incentive. Human rights and modern slavery disclosures remain nascent.
G
Governance — Board, Integrity & Transparency
71%
Disclosure Maturity: Advanced (relative)
Most advanced disclosure pillar relative to E and S. NGX ESG Disclosure Guidelines are the primary driver. Board composition, audit integrity, and anti-corruption frameworks are the best-reported governance indicators. ESG board committee formalisation is the leading edge.
Current Intelligence Signals
IFRS S2 climate risk disclosure is gaining attention across Nigerian banking institutions, driven by CBN Climate Risk Management Framework alignment requirements. Governance pillar adoption is leading — scenario analysis and financed emissions disclosure remain near-absent.
Governance · Banking & Financial Services
NGX ESG Disclosure Guidelines compliance at 61% formal reporting compliance rate across monitored listed companies, with substantive governance quality at 34%. Materiality assessment processes remain absent in 73% of reporting entities — disclosure is formal but not intelligence-grade.
Standards Intelligence · Governance · Nigeria Listed Companies
Oil & Gas community impact disclosures remain the largest sector-level disclosure gap in the monitored universe. Recurring gaps between operational impact profile and disclosed indicators, with FPIC documentation absent in 94% of monitored operators — a critical DFI financing risk threshold.
Social · Oil & Gas
Agriculture biodiversity and smallholder indicators are gaining disclosure quality as agri-business issuers strengthen sector-specific reporting in response to EUDR supply chain documentation requirements and AfDB green finance conditionality. MIL-150 agriculture indicator adoption is measurably improving quarter-on-quarter.
Environmental · Agriculture & Agri-Business
ISSB adoption trajectory across Africa is accelerating. South Africa has moved to mandatory reporting for JSE-listed companies. Kenya is integrating IFRS S1/S2 into CMA guidance. Nigeria's SEC and CBN are both referencing ISSB as the direction of mandatory travel. The 18–24 month compliance window is narrowing for Nigerian financial institutions.
Standards Intelligence · ISSB · Multi-Market
Insurance sector ESG maturity is constrained by climate physical risk assessment capability. Underwriting portfolio exposure to weather-related events is high but ESG disclosure quality is low — creating a widening gap between actual risk and disclosed risk. This is a strategic vulnerability as African reinsurance capacity tightens.
Environmental · Insurance
These signals represent sector-level public intelligence only. Analyst-grade intelligence — company-specific evidence, detailed gap registers, ratings documentation, transformation roadmaps, and DFI-ready evidence packages — is available via the AESA platform. Registration opens access to the governed workspace.
Calibration Governance

Platform Calibration — Methodology Maturity Statement

AESA ESG intelligence is produced by 57 documented platform functions — the analytical processes, scoring algorithms, inference rules, and governance protocols that convert raw evidence into rated intelligence output. Each function is formally documented, versioned, and assigned a calibration category that describes the strength of its methodological basis. This public statement of calibration maturity is a structural differentiator: most ESG intelligence providers do not publish the calibration basis of their scoring functions.

57
Documented Platform Functions
Across 9 priority function groups — all current, no pending review flags
3
Calibration Categories
Formally Derived, Market Norm, Working Assumption — each with defined recalibration triggers
5
Active Calibration Triggers
Automated and manual triggers govern when functions require recalibration review
Calibration Categories
18
Formally Derived
Functions derived from peer-reviewed research, published regulatory guidance, formal academic studies, or established statistical methods. These functions carry the strongest methodological basis and require formal evidence to recalibrate. They include framework detection logic, confidence suppression rules, and band threshold assignments.
4
Market Norm
Functions calibrated to observed market practice — DFI due diligence standards, institutional investor ESG integration norms, and African regulatory compliance expectations. These are grounded in documented market practice rather than academic evidence. They are recalibrated when market norms shift materially.
35
Working Assumption
Functions based on professional judgment, analyst consensus, or interim assumptions where formal evidence is not yet available. These are the functions most subject to future recalibration as platform data accumulates. Working assumptions are documented, version-controlled, and monitored for recalibration trigger conditions. Their status is transparent — not concealed behind black-box scoring.
Calibration Trigger Monitor

The Calibration Trigger Monitor governs when functions require formal review. Triggers are defined in advance and fire automatically or manually depending on condition type. When a trigger fires, the affected functions enter a mandatory review cycle before the next production run.

group
Percentile Estimate Trigger
Fires when cohort size reaches ≥ 30 companies per sector. Sector-level percentile and benchmark functions gain sufficient sample depth to replace working assumption calibration with data-derived parameters. Currently auto-monitoring across all 9 sectors.
Auto
assignment_turned_in
Advisory Depth Score Trigger
Fires when closed advisory cases reach ≥ 15. Advisory intelligence functions gain recalibration data from closed cases — pattern data from completed transformation engagements informs recommendation register quality thresholds.
Auto
lock_clock
Governance Safety Gate
Scheduled auto-trigger on 2026-12-14. A full calibration review cycle is mandated at a fixed date to ensure all working assumption functions have been re-evaluated against 12 months of platform intelligence data. This is a platform governance commitment, not a conditional trigger.
Auto
policy
Framework Alignment Trigger
ISSB framework wiring is complete. Fires manually when the regulatory trajectory of IFRS S1/S2 adoption across African jurisdictions materially changes — e.g., Nigeria SECs mandatory adoption timeline announcement or CBN integration of IFRS S2 into Sustainable Finance Principles.
Manual
groups
ESG Maturity for Deal Trigger
Human consultation trigger activated quarterly (Q3 2026 review scheduled). Functions that assess ESG maturity in the context of DFI deal structuring are reviewed with advisory practitioners to ensure calibration reflects current DFI due diligence standards — which evolve faster than published policy.
Manual · Quarterly
Intelligence Transparency Centre (ITC)
Full documentation of all 57 platform functions — including function definitions, calibration basis, current calibration status, version history, and trigger monitoring status — is available to registered platform users via the Intelligence Transparency Centre (ITC). The ITC is a documentation register only; it does not propagate changes. To update a function, the TypeScript implementation is changed first, and ITC documentation is updated to reflect the change. This sequence ensures that ITC always describes actual system behaviour, not aspirational specification.
Platform Access
Access Company-Level Intelligence, Ratings & ITC Documentation
Registration opens access to detailed sector breakdowns, company ESG ratings with lineage, gap registers, transformation roadmaps, the full MIL-150 intelligence schema, and the Intelligence Transparency Centre where all 57 platform functions are documented.
Open Platform Gateway →
Advisory Services
Work With Our Intelligence & Advisory Team
For organisations requiring hands-on ESG assessment, ratings documentation, DFI deal preparation, or a calibrated transformation programme — our advisory team can scope and deliver directly.
Contact AESA →